The comment discussion with
elissali has brought up another issue that I want the peanut gallery's thoughts on. We're talking about Disney films and the tiny princess factor. One of the things that I liked about Happy Feet was the lack of tiny body images, but there was a lack of humans in the film. The Disney films that I can think of that don't include impossibly proportioned girls are the animal movies like Lion King and Ice Age (that was disney, wasn't it?). Since animals are the ultimate "other," they don't have to hold to human beauty standards (even if the female animals in these films are often given anthropomorphically feminine characteristics).
Come to think of it, I don't think I've purposely seen a kids film in the last decade that wasn't an animal film, probably because while I was in highschool I decided that I was boycotting Disney femininity...I guess I actually am only boycotting Disney *human* femininity.
And for the record, Disney certainly hasn't cornered the market on heinous and impossible portrayal of women in animation. Anime's big-eye'd big-headed stick-figure girls in school girl uniforms really makes me wonder if it is even worse in Japan. Or, because it's SUCH a characature, is it taken as a non-human representation? Maybe I should go search J-stor for work on this, since I'm sure it must be there.
EDIT: Of course this work has been done - have a look at this:
(and I'm interested that this stuff doesn't show up in women's studies journals, it's in film and japanese studies scholarly collections)
http://www.jstor.org/view/00151386/ap040134/04a00020/0?currentResult=00151386%2bap040134%2b04a00020%2b0%2cFE7F&searchUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fsearch%2FBasicResults%3Fhp%3D25%26si%3D1%26Query%3Danime